Bibliometric analysis of dematel method

Creative Commons License

KOCA G., Yildirim S.

Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, cilt.4, sa.1, ss.85-103, 2021 (Scopus) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 4 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2021
  • Doi Numarası: 10.31181/dmame2104085g
  • Dergi Adı: Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.85-103
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Bibliometric, DEMATEL, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Web of Science
  • Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

© 2020 Regional Association for Security and crisis management. All rights reserved.In this study, a bibliometric analysis of the studies evaluated with DEMATEL (Decision Making Experiment and Evaluation Laboratory Method), one of the MCDM methods in Web of Science, was performed according to various performance indicators. The total number of DEMATEL publications examined is 1963 documents. When DEMATEL studies are evaluated in terms of countries, it is seen that China is the leader (553 documents; 28.17%). The most cooperative country is China. The country with the highest h-index is Taiwan (62). Journal of Cleaner Production is the most efficient journal (96; 4.88%). National Chiao Tung University (102, 5.19%) is ranked as the most efficient institution in DEMATEL research. Among the most used words are "Model", "DEMATEL", "Selection", "Management", "fuzzy DEMATEL".