Optimum insulation thickness of the piping system with combined economic and environmental method
Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, vol.40, no.23, pp.2876-2885, 2018 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Publication Type: Article / Article
- Volume: 40 Issue: 23
- Publication Date: 2018
- Doi Number: 10.1080/15567036.2018.1512683
- Journal Name: Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects
- Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
- Page Numbers: pp.2876-2885
- Keywords: Combined economic and environmental method, energy saving, global warming potential, optimum insulation thickness, pipe insulation
- Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University Affiliated: Yes
Abstract
© 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.In the present study, an alternative method combining economic and environmental costs is suggested for the pipe insulation. This method is called as combined economic and environment method (CEEM). Bilecik, which is located in the Marmara region, Turkey, is chosen. Rockwool and glass wool are chosen as insulation materials. The optimum insulation thicknesses of three different methods including CEEM, economic, and environmental approaches are calculated and compared. Optimum points are 0.46 m (CEEM), 0.39 m (economic approach), and 0.54 m (environmental approach) for rockwool; and 0.46 m (CEEM), 0.40 m (economic approach), and 0.59 m (environmental approach) for glass wool. In addition, annual cost savings and energy savings are determined.